Re: SpinRite
Posted: Thu Nov 16, 2023 2:22 am
New open issues with SpinRite...
Data Recovery Discussion and Support Forum
https://recoveryforce.com/forums/
Yeah, his answer is totally unsatisfactory and I'm trying rubbing his nose in. Saying SMART is nonsense while at the same time: https://www.grc.com/sr/smart.htm .. You can not have it both ways.fzabkar wrote: ↑Wed Nov 15, 2023 6:01 pmSteve distrusts SMART because he doesn't understand it. As you say, the one time that he tried to make use of SMART, he made a complete mess of things. His mistake was to apply intuitive logic to a counterintuitive case, specifically a Seagate drive. Essentially, SpinRite took a perfectly healthy drive and just kept spewing out thousands of bogus errors.Joep wrote:For example, SR hasn't got a clue about SMART stats as reported by Seagate drives.
https://www.hddoracle.com/viewtopic.php?p=21743#p21743
There's been ample evidence in the past that some drives simply lie about their SMART status to appear healthier than they are.
Move on to the current SpinRite 6.1 pre-release, SRPR-RC5 - I found the controls to be more responsive.
I also consider 'conservative' command line options, like FORCEBIOS and DYNASTAT 1.
Let us know how it works for you.
I also use supplemental cooling fans to keep the drive at room temperature, and I remove and replace the drive's circuit board and clean the contacts underneath.
Thanks.
Quite simply, the reallocated sectors are wiped by an ATA Secure Erase Unit command, with the Enhanced Mode bit set. No special, esoteric knowledge required.Note that DBAN is not acceptable in UK Government use because it only cleans LBA-addressable sectors. You have to use Blancco or some other accredited utility, which also wipes spare sectors and ex-LBA sectors that have gone bad and been spared out (grown defects). It's also why Steve has Beyond Recall as a slated future project - his knowledge of the ATA command set would allow him to do a much more thorough job than DBAN.
I'll remove those statements. By a tie I meant the number of bad sectors detected, maybe I should go and clarify that.lcoughey wrote: ↑Thu Nov 16, 2023 4:23 pm spinrite.png
Is the first statement really true? How can anyone claim that a process that does not transfer a single sector from a failing drive with a high chance of completete failure and head crash is data recovery?
And to the statement that it was a tie between RapidSpar and Spinrite, how can that be? After Spinrite was done, the only copy of the user data is still on only one drive that is failing. Meanwhile, after RapidSpar is done, the data also exists on a stable drive.